The business world is becoming more global as we
look to decrease costs and increase profits. As businesses begin to
move production to other countries, as well as trade in other
countries, a push for a single international accounting body has
increased. Investors, multinational companies, regulators, the
securities industry and developing countries all look to harmonize
accounting (Saudagaran, 2001). The diversity in the world has brought
troubles to global accounting, while many groups have pushed for
harmonization in accounting principles.
Many groups have urged for accounting
harmonization. Intelligent investors are looking to take their money to
other markets and want to make successful decisions. Reliability and
comparability are the main issues that investors face when looking to
invest in countries other than their own (Saudagaran, 2001). They are
at the risk of converting another countries' financials to financials
they understand, and simply do not have the time or money in which to
invest globally. While investors look to harmonize accounting
standards, so do the companies in which they invest. Multinational
companies are looking to expand their capital, product and labor
globally in order to successfully compete in their market (Saudagaran,
2001). While taking sales, labor and capital to other countries,
companies are forced to invest more resources and time into preparing
the financials to the standards of the different countries' regulations.
With investors and companies expanding their
efforts into diverse countries, regulators are forced to monitor
companies with differing financials. Regulators want to comply with
foreign businesses without having to drive them away. With the
monitoring of firms with different financials in their authority,
regulating can become quite costly. More costs are brought onto a
company when they look to exchange stock globally. These costs pose a
problem because stock exchanges are looking for listings growth and
transactions from foreign companies. As the world becomes more
dependent upon diversity in the business world, companies are not only
looking to list their stock in other countries, but trying to look
attractive as well (Saudagaran, 2001).
One of the bigger problems arising from so many
different accounting standards across the globe is the start-up of an
advancing country. Developing countries are looking to adopt
international accounting standards. Without the time or money to
construct accounting standards from scratch, these countries are
obligated to apply an accounting system from a country that they feel
will give investors assurance in their companies (Saudagaran, 2001).
Minimizing differences in accounting standards will not only help cut
costs and time, but will also make the global market more efficient and
smooth. Investors will have the confidence to invest in foreign
countries; companies will have the ability to compete in a global
perspective; regulators can monitor with ease; security transactions
can take place in any country; and growing countries will have the
ability to grow economically (Saudagaran, 2001).
While these groups push for the harmonization of
accounting standards, we must understand why there is diversity in
accounting. According to Ahmed Riahi-Belkaoui (2002), the differences
in accounting standards come from the diverse "economic development,
business complexity, political persuasion, and system of law" of
countries.
Where a country is located economically affects
its accounting standards. From developed to developing, a country has
different needs and therefore has different standards. The business
complexity, or the technological and industrial knowledge, also
accounts for the different standards across the globe. Whether the
government or the market has more control over the economy is a third
reason for diversity in accounting standards. Finally, political
persuasion, such as common-law or code-law, explains some of the
diversity in accounting. Many other factors can explain the reason
behind diverse accounting standards, such as education level, but the
main reason for different accounting standards is the diversity of the
globe. No two countries run the same way, politically or economically.
As we expand our business globally and incorporate
foreign businesses into our domestic economies, we are experiencing
more costs and time in the efforts of reporting financials. Not only
does the difference in accounting bring about the increased costs and
time, but it also brings in the rationality of trust. According to Sten
Jonsson (1996), "The game situation is defined precisely by the mutual
expectations of players to abide by the rules and there usually is a
clear definition of what constitutes a winning situation which gives
the game its goal direction. Cheating ruins ‘everything', that is the
sense of the game" (p. 12). Diversity controls the differences in
accounting standards, but the need for a single accounting standard is
increasing as the market becomes more globally dependent.
References: Jonsson, Sten. (1996). Accounting for
Improvement. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon.
Riahi-Belkaoui, Ahmed (2002). International
Accounting and Economic Development: The Interaction of Accounting,
Economic, and Social Indicators. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Saudagaran, Shahrokh M. (2001). International
Accounting: A User Perspective. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Pub.
Article Source: http://
www.articlesbase.com/international-business-articles/a-
single-set-of-accounting-standards-3679426.html About the Author
|